CapitalTime
Articles on investing and capital management, with a quantitative focus.
Growth Portfolio Annual Update
2020-06-08
My Growth portfolio outperformed the TSX in this time period. Several holdings no longer meet my screening criteria and have been replaced. After today’s adjustments, the portfolio holds:
Stock Symbol | Company Sector |
---|---|
CJT | Consumer |
MRU | Consumer |
CP | Industrial |
RBA | Industrial |
CSU | Technology |
DSG | Technology |
BAM.A | Financials |
FSV | Financials |
FNV | Materials |
WDO | Materials |
Ideally, the positions should have equal weights. To minimize trading, I don’t adjust position sizes if they are reasonably close to equal.
To reduce turnover and trading costs, I am switching to annual updates. Previously, I was updating the portfolio ever 6 months.
Performance
The lifetime CAGR (compound annual growth rate) since inception is 9.5%, compared to the benchmark XIC at 4.0%. This outperformance is significant.
Performance is calculated for each time period shown. I use actual fill prices if there was a trade, or the bid price otherwise. Trade fees are ignored. The XIC return includes dividends, but the Growth return does not.
Start | End | Growth | XIC |
---|---|---|---|
2016-12-28 | 2017-06-19 | 15.0% | 0.7% |
2017-06-19 | 2017-12-27 | 2.6% | 7.2% |
2017-12-27 | 2018-06-18 | 4.9% | 2.5% |
2018-06-18 | 2018-12-17 | -11.6% | -10.3% |
2018-12-17 | 2019-06-19 | 20.1% | 16.1% |
2019-06-19 | 2019-12-27 | 6.3% | 5.5% |
2019-12-27 | 2020-06-08 | -2.1% | -5.9% |
Lifetime CAGR | 3.4 yrs | 9.5% | 4.0% |
Alternative start date
Note that the first time period in the above table gives Growth a significant lead. In case this first period was a fluke, I will also calculate performance starting from the second period.
Here is the CAGR performance starting from 2017-06-19
Alternative start | Growth | XIC | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
CAGR over 3.0 yrs | 6.0% | 4.4% | 1.6% |
The Growth portfolio still outperforms, but with a smaller margin.
— Jem Berkes